Breaking
Politics

CPCB defends exclusion of extreme PM 2.5 spikes from AQI

📅 Published: 11 Nov 2026, 09:51 pm IST• 🔄 Updated: 11 Nov 2026, 09:51 pm IST• 4 min read• 1 views
A Continuous Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Station in Delhi monitoring pollution levels during the winter season.
The CPCB monitors air quality across 59 stations in Delhi.
Key Points
  • CPCB excludes PM 2.5 readings exceeding 1,000 µg/m³ from hourly AQI calculations.
  • Over 20 of Delhi's 59 air quality stations failed to report data on Diwali night.
  • The CPCB attributes data gaps to an automated validation system rather than under-reporting.
  • CSE analysis shows pre-Diwali PM 2.5 levels in 2026 were 97% higher than in 2025.
  • Environment Ministry sources confirm the 2015 data validation framework requires an overhaul.

The Central Pollution Control Board said on Wednesday, November 11, 2026, that gaps in Delhi's air quality data are caused by an automated system excluding extreme PM 2.5 spikes. The board stated that these differences between government data and private platforms result from its methodology rather than under-reporting.

This technical gap shows why public data appears different from private platforms during extreme pollution events.

Automated system excludes readings above 1,000 µg/m³

The Central Pollution Control Board said its monitoring equipment is calibrated only for ranges up to 999 µg/m³. Readings exceeding 1,000 micrograms per cubic metre are treated as out-of-range by the automated data validation system.

Consequently, these extreme concentrations are excluded from the 24-hour average calculation. An Environment Ministry source told reporters that the data is collected but not used in the calculation.

The CPCB explained in an 11-point statement on November 10 that these gaps occur because out-of-range readings are omitted.

Focus on prolonged exposure over momentary spikes

The Central Pollution Control Board said the National Air Quality Index is designed to measure prolonged exposure to pollution. The agency defended its use of a 24-hour running average for health impact assessments.

It considers momentary spikes, such as those from Diwali firecrackers, less relevant indicators of health effects. The index is computed by an automated system without human intervention, and individual pollutant concentrations remain available in the public domain.

Calls for overhaul of 2015 validation framework

Environment Ministry sources state the 2015 data validation system is outdated and requires a comprehensive review. The CPCB is currently reviewing its methodology to account for advancements in monitoring technology and international practices.

This review addresses why extreme pollution readings currently fall outside the 2015 data validation framework. Internal discussions are underway involving two or three scientists, though no official external expert group has been constituted.

Discrepancies between government and private platforms

Private applications often display higher pollution levels due to variations in measurement techniques, averaging periods, and the use of low-cost sensors. The CPCB maintains a strict AQI ceiling of 500 for its own calculations.

The board asserts that readings beyond this level remain in the severe category. It maintains that extending the index would not change the assigned health impact for residents.

CSE reports record-high pre-winter pollution levels

In the week leading up to Diwali 2026, the average PM 2.5 level reached 236 micrograms per cubic meter.

This level is the highest recorded in the last three years.

Anumita Roychowdhury of the CSE stated that elevated pollution levels before the festival indicate higher baseline pollution compared to previous years.

Sharanjit Kaur of the CSE noted that toxic pollutant levels were notably higher in the week before the festival compared to previous years.

Transport identified as primary pollution source

The study identified transport as the primary local source of pollution in Delhi-NCR. Analysis of traffic congestion confirmed that vehicular emissions are the main cause of daily toxic pollution exposure.

The CSE report claims that emergency restrictions on pre-BS-VI vehicles have failed to reduce traffic congestion.

Anumita Roychowdhury said year-round measures to control emissions from key sources have been insufficient. She added that pollution would not have reached critical levels if the air had been cleaner at the start of winter and if stubble burning and firecracker bursting were effectively curbed.

Adani's Kutch Copper has become the first Indian producer to receive the 'Copper Mark'.

Expansion of monitoring network since 2014

The index uses a 24-hour average for most pollutants, while carbon monoxide and ozone use an eight-hour average, with the highest sub-index determining the hourly air quality index.

There were 35 stations still not reporting at 2 am on Monday.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were there gaps in Delhi's AQI data during Diwali?
The CPCB's automated system excludes hourly PM 2.5 readings exceeding 1,000 µg/m³ as they are outside the equipment's original calibration range.
Does the CPCB under-report pollution levels?
No, the CPCB states that differences between government and private data are due to varying measurement methodologies and averaging periods.
Is the current AQI methodology being updated?
Yes, the CPCB is currently reviewing its methodology to account for technological advancements and evolving international practices.
How this story was made: written with AI assistance from the published reports and data linked below, then checked by automated filters that compare its facts against those sources. Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Our editorial policy.

Add NewsPulse Time as a preferred source on Google

Get the week's best in one email
One digest a week: the most-read posts and the numbers worth knowing. No spam; unsubscribe in one click.
Delhi PollutionCPCBAQIDiwaliPM 2.5EnvironmentAir Quality
Share: