Breaking
Sports

ICC moves to tighten control over global T20 franchise leagues

📅 Published: 13 Nov 2026, 06:23 am IST• 🔄 Updated: 13 Nov 2026, 06:23 am IST• 4 min read• 1 views
The International Cricket Council logo displayed at a cricket stadium during a T20 franchise league match.
The ICC is reviewing oversight of T20 leagues worldwide.
Key Points
  • The ICC plans to limit overseas players to four per team in T20 leagues.
  • New anti-corruption rules mandate the use of the ICC's integrity unit for sanctioning.
  • Betting company sponsorships for teams and leagues face a potential ban.
  • The ILT20 and MLC face significant commercial impacts from the proposed changes.
  • Legal advice suggests ICC members have no strong basis to challenge these reforms.

The International Cricket Council has proposed plans to exert greater control and implement tighter regulations over T20 franchise leagues to address integrity and calendar concerns. ICC board heads are scheduled to discuss these proposed changes at an upcoming meeting.

The Chief Executives' Committee will review these recommendations before passing them to the ICC board for approval where appropriate.

Proposed cap of four overseas players threatens ILT20 and MLC

The ICC recommends limiting teams to four overseas players per XI in T20 franchise leagues. This regulation threatens the commercial viability of the ILT20 in the United Arab Emirates and Major League Cricket in the United States.

Both leagues currently exceed this limit, having been granted exemptions from ICC capping rules in 2023. The ILT20 allows up to nine overseas players per XI, while the MLC allows up to six.

Five of the six ILT20 owners are involved in the Indian Premier League or Women's Premier League, and four MLC teams have ties to IPL ownership groups.

Stricter anti-corruption and betting sponsorship bans

The ICC is proposing stricter anti-corruption rules to address risks within T20 franchise leagues. The ICC recommends that leagues use the ICC's Anti-Corruption Unit or another approved integrity unit to receive sanctioning.

For leagues deemed high-risk, organizers must bear the costs of the ICC ACU on a not-for-profit basis. The ICC also proposes a ban on betting companies or their surrogates sponsoring teams or leagues to mitigate illegal betting and corruption risks.

New sanctioning fees and review of member authority

The ICC proposes widening its jurisdiction to review or reject sanctions provided by Full Members if they have failed to comply with obligations or present significant integrity concerns.

A review group also recommends that the ICC charge a fee for all league sanctioning applications. This income would fund the due diligence checks and corruption investigations required for such events.

Standardizing solidarity payments and addressing league disputes

The ICC chief executives' committee is set to discuss whether to make solidarity payments to members for overseas players both mandatory and standardized. Current regulations require these payments but allow members to negotiate the specific amount.

This flexibility has led to disputes, such as the stand-off between the Pakistan Cricket Board and the Abu Dhabi T10. A review group is now asking executives to consider a standard solidarity fee, potentially as a fixed percentage applied consistently across all leagues and players.

Concerns over legends leagues and territorial limits

The committee has requested that the CEC and ICC board evaluate the status of "legends leagues". They stated these competitions "generate significant integrity concerns" because they blur the distinction between active and retired players.

Officials are seeking direction on whether these leagues should fall under the ICC's formal sanctioning framework. They are also reviewing how to handle players who participate in these tournaments before playing in approved cricket matches.

This proposed limit could have implications for the various leagues currently staged in the UAE.

Legal standing of proposed ICC reforms

A review group led by Bangladesh Cricket Board president Tamim Iqbal, and including Richard Gould, Todd Greenberg, and Devajit Saikia, sought external legal advice regarding these reforms. The advice confirmed that ICC members would not "have any good legal basis to challenge these changes".

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the proposed limit for overseas players in T20 leagues?
The ICC is recommending a cap of four overseas players per XI.
How will the ICC handle anti-corruption for leagues?
Leagues must use the ICC's Anti-Corruption Unit or an approved integrity unit to receive sanctioning.
Can ICC members legally challenge these proposed changes?
Legal advice obtained by the ICC review group suggests members would not have a strong legal basis to challenge the reforms.
How this story was made: written with AI assistance from the published reports and data linked below, then checked by automated filters that compare its facts against those sources. Spotted an error? Tell us and we will correct it. Our editorial policy.

Add NewsPulse Time as a preferred source on Google

Get the week's best in one email
One digest a week: the most-read posts and the numbers worth knowing. No spam; unsubscribe in one click.
ICCT20 CricketILT20MLCCricket IntegritySports GovernanceCricket News
Share: